Cine prado analysis
Of national culture and identity in Mexico. Which Mexico’s film industry became one of the most productive in the world, exercising a decisive influence on constructions This book studies the early years of what has been called the ‘golden age’ of Mexican cinema, a period that runs for about two decades, roughly from 1936 to 1956, during Transnational logic of today’s cultural economy … is not an entirely new phenomenon’ ( ‘Myths’, p. 106) or as US film historian Seth Fein puts it, ‘the However, as Brazilian film historian and critic PauloĪntonio Paranaguá notes, studies of Latin American film history bring to life ‘mythologies capable of transcendingīorders long before the rise 2 of telenovelas and world music’ Smothering of media flows from poorer areas of the world – with the case of Latin American telenovelas being a majorĬase in point, even these studies often fall into the tendency to posit movements in terms of hegemonic-subaltern contexts,Īnd nearly all of them ignore the complexities of Latin American media flows in the early years of the cultural industries’ While many studies are conscious that heightened states of globalisation have not led to the Globalisation often tend to be constructed in binary terms, with the USA or other major metropolitan media centres positionedĪgainst the rest of the world. Still, it is clear that what cultural exchange exists between the two countries is not equal, and the same couldīe said for many other Latin American countries, including relatively large ones such as Venezuela, Chile and Peru.ĭiscussions of globalised media and the patterns of cultural flows in the context of (1999–2001), although remade under a different name by Televisa, is only one of many Colombian soap operas well known Whose cultural expressions are well known in Mexico, including painter Fernandoīotero, novelist Gabriel García Márquez and singer Shakira. National dishes, are virtually unknown in Mexico most Mexicans would not have any idea of what traditional folkloric costumes,ĭances, or archetypes are the most widely accepted symbols of national culture in Colombia. The bandera paesa or ajiaco, Colombia’s most emblematic While the cumbia is well known in Mexico, no classic Colombian cumbia artist has the iconic status in MexicoĬomparable to that of Mexican superstars Jorge Negrete or Los Tigres del Norte in Colombia. And what is particularly remarkable is that there is not an equal Of everyday life elsewhere, especially in Latin America.
What many Mexicans think of as national symbols are often part Mexican culture is not only well known throughout Latin America, but it is habitually consumed, whether through images ofįrida Kahlo’s artwork, the iconography of the Virgin of Guadalupe,Ĭharro hats, tacos and enchiladas, ranchera music, Guacamole and salsa picante – there is a significant presence of certain common signifiers of Mexican culture. There are tequila bars, mariachi clubs, menus featuring Processes of Americanisation, or of Latin American commonalities.
For example, to Bogotá – from Mexico provokes a feeling of familiarity that goes beyond the recognition of globalising